> But in fact, the only thing that privileges the set of all
>operations that we see in nature, is that they are instantiated by
>the laws of physics. It is only through our knowledge of the physical
>that we know of the di.erence between computable and not computable. So
>it's only through our laws of physics that the nature of computation can
>be understood. It can never be vice versa."

methinks it be just the inverse; the "laws" of fizziks emerge from
"underlying" computation, itself the result of initial rules (laws?)...


<--enter gratuitous quotation that implies my profundity here-->

Reply via email to