Bruno Marchal wrote:
As we are all just speculating, you are just speculating that the physical laws
Then I would like to underline some basic considerations. A universe where
the only weird thing is the fact to obtain number 6 any time you throw a
die doesn't violate any "extremely possibility-constraining constraints".
A universe where, by chance, the Lutezio element always occupy 99.5679459
percent of the volume available only when it is in a Astato box, doesn't
transgress the constraints of the existence of self-organization. And so
on. There could be an infinite of other examples (...and beyond!).
and initial conditions required to ensure that "a dice always comes up 6" or
"the Lutezio element always occupy 99.5679459 percent of the volume available
only when it is in a Astato box" would not somehow prevent self-organization in
Could there be only one "OBSERVABLE POSSIBLE" world? ...almost surely the multiverse teory doesn't tell us that...
No, probably it doesn't tell us that. But that theory plus complex systems theory may tell us that
only a relatively narrow class of worlds are observable. And multiverse theory plus basic
logic tells us that in any case, there's no communication between those worlds (in that narrow
class), so for all practical intents and purposes, the other worlds can be ignored, with the one
exception that the possibility of multiple (albeit highly constrained) futures at every moment
leads possibly to a true notion of free will, and/or equivalently a true version of quantum uncertainty
as to the outcome of events in what we perceive as our world line.