|
We observe that our universe uses a reversible
computation, yet our brains only
appear to use irreversible computation.
It seems important to ask why. Is it possible for SAS’s to live in a universe that is directly associated
with an irreversible computation? If
so then why are we special? Computer science seems to be centered around the concept of “assignment”.
For example, computer memory
undergoes state changes in the form of assignments to memory locations. A Turing machine uses assignment
operations each time a 1 or 0 is written on the tape. Assignment involves lost information
because it simply overwrites the previous value with a new value. It is fundamentally irreversible. I have been wondering whether we can get a better
understanding of reversible computation by distinguishing between movement of
information and assignment of information.
The analogy of the Turing machine would be that we need to cut up the
tape with scissors – we are only allowed to move bits of tape around,
rather than reassign values on the tape. This leads quickly to the view of
particles that move around, rather
than the idea of a particle that is stored in space (= memory) that moves as
the result of “assignments to space”. So rather than think of a small piece of space having an
attribute of what particle is in it, we should think of a particle as having an
attribute of where it is in space. The
latter view makes space seem rather incidental – rather than thinking of
particles as being embedded in space. I wonder to what extent physicists
distinguish between these two views.
I guess the distinction evaporates in string theory, where
there is nothing but (higher dimensional) space-time. There is nothing to assign to
because the information is present in the topology of space itself. Movement of information is more like a
ripple on a pond. The Turing machine seems to lack a direct relevance to our
universe. However, can’t a Turing machine
emulate a reversible computation? - David |
- Move versus assign David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Move versus assign Stephen Paul King
- Re: Move versus assign Russell Standish
- RE: Move versus assign David Barrett-Lennard
- Re: Move versus assign Russell Standish
- RE: Move versus assign David Barrett-Lennard

