Dear Bruno,
Thank you for this post. It gives me a
chance to reintroduce one problem that I have with your model. Like you, I
am very interested in comments from others, as it could very well be that I am
misunderstanding some subtle detail of your thesis.
You wrote:
"... remembering the comp 1indeterminacy, that is that if you are
duplicate
into an exemplary at Sidney and another at Pekin, your actual expectation is indeterminate and can be captured by some measure, let us say P = 1/2, and this (capital point) independently of the time chosen for any of each reconstitution (at Pekin or Sidney), giving that the delays of reconstitution cannot be perceived (recorded by the first person))." Now my problem is that IF there is any
aspect of perception and/or "observers" that involves a quantum mechanical
state there will be the need to take the "nocloning" theorem into account. For
example, we find in the following paper a discussion of this theorem and its
consequences for teleportation:
As a possible way to exploit a potential
loop hole in this, I point you to the following:
My main question boils down to this: Does
Comp 1determinacy require this duplication to be exact? Is it sufficient that
approximately similar copies could be generated and not exact duplicates? How would this affect your ideas about
measures, if at all?
I understand that you are trying to derive
QM from Comp and thus might not see the applicability of my question, but
as a reply to this I will again point your to the various papers that have been
written showing that it is impossible to embed or describe completely a QM
system (and its logics) using only a classical system (and its logics), if
that QM system has more that two Hilbert space dimensions associated.
Start with the KochenSpecker theorem...
I will address Kory's post
latter.
Kindest regards,
Stephen

 Re: Is the universe computable Stephen Paul King
 Re: Is the universe computable Bruno Marchal
 Re: Is the universe computable Stephen Paul King
 Re: Is the universe computable Bruno Marchal
 Re: Is the universe computable Stephen Paul King
 Re: Is the universe computable Hal Finney
 Re: Is the universe computable Stephen Paul King
 Re: Is the universe computable Bruno Marchal
 Re: Is the universe computable Kory Heath