Thanks for the message.
Perhaps one could call the incompleteness of the "Nothing" a "vacuum energy" because it always has and always will drive the dynamic of my system.
At 06:56 PM 5/6/2004, you wrote:
Hal, before the time when we met on another list I tackled 'similar' concerns. Very briefly: I picked "nothingness" rather than "nothing". The first reaction was: If I consider "nothingness" at all, it already became "somethingness". This was how I started to build up the world at that time (~1990). Later I learned about the (alleged) energy content of vacuum, (calculkated some ^120 of the material content of our universe...) which has fit perfectly in my own nonsense-speculation. Just a reminiscense Cheers John Mikes