You're right, as was discussed last week. It seems I clicked on the wrong
thing in my email program and have re-sent an old post. My apologies for
taking up the bandwidth!
--Stathis
From: Kory Heath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: re: observation selection effects
Date: Sat, 09 Oct 2004 18:17:50 -0400
At 10:35 AM 10/9/2004, Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
From the point of view of typical player, it would seem that there is not:
the Winning Flip is as likely to be heads as tails, and if he played the
game repeatedly over time, he should expect to break even, whether he
switches in the final step or not.
That's not correct. While it's true that the Winning Flip is as likely to
be heads as tails, it's not true that I'm as likely to be in the winning
group as the loosing group. Look at the case when there are only three
players. There are eight possible outcomes:
Me: H Player 1: H Player 2: H - WF: T
Me: H Player 1: H Player 2: T - WF: T
Me: H Player 1: T Player 2: H - WF: T
Me: H Player 1: T Player 2: T - WF: H
Me: T Player 1: H Player 2: H - WF: T
Me: T Player 1: H Player 2: T - WF: H
Me: T Player 1: T Player 2: H - WF: H
Me: T Player 1: T Player 2: T - WF: H
I am in the winning group in only two out of these eight cases. So my
chances of winning if I don't switch are 1/4, and my chances of winning if
I do switch are 3/4. There's no paradox here.
-- Kory
_________________________________________________________________
Enter our Mobile Babe Search and win big! http://ninemsn.com.au/babesearch
