Hi Georges:

At 08:16 AM 11/14/2004, you wrote:
Hal Ruhl wrote:
> 4) A Something: A division of the All into two subparts.

That too, sounds bad to me. It might well be that the only something that
deserve the title of Something would be the All itself. Everything else
might appear so only in our minds (and/or in other types of minds).


I believe my use of the term "Something" in the text of the justification is consistent with my definition. One must allow for the case that the All could have internal boundaries of some sort.


Reply via email to