To answer a few other comments/questions:

Boundaries: I have as I said in one post of this thread and as I recall in some earlier related threads defined information as a potential to erect a boundary. So the All is chuck full of this potential. Actual boundaries are the Everything and any evolving Something.

Something(s): In my model these are evolving universes and not anti Nothings. The All is the anti Nothing.

Definitions: The only definitions for which I identify both members of the [is, is not] pair are the [All,Nothing] pair and the complementary Somethings pairs. [Is, is not] pairs are not alternates or true/false comparisons but are rather information/content complements. The Everything is a boundary and its complement is all other boundaries. True noise is a concept re information flow and its complement is all other concepts.

The All and the Nothing are not mutually exclusive. Perhaps the "exclusive" idea is based on a hidden assumption of some sort of space that can only be filled with or somehow contain one or the other but not both.


Reply via email to