Hal
All members of [is,is not] definitional pairs including the [All, Nothing]
pair have a "conceptual" foundation within the All. Why would the [All,
Nothing} pair be the only one denied a mutual and concurrent "physical"
expression?
- Re: Fw: An All/Nothing multiverse model Hal Ruhl
- Re: Fw: An All/Nothing multiverse model Georges Quenot
- Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Georges Quenot
- Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Georges Quenot
- Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Hal Ruhl
- Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Hal Ruhl
- Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Hal Ruhl
- Re: An All/Nothing multiverse model Hal Ruhl