Hi Russell:

My dynamic in part produces worlds that appear to have time as a property but also produces all kinds of worlds that have no time in the sense of there being any ordered sequence. There are also "worlds" that are just a single kernel that is given physical reality in a manner commensurate with the features of the dynamic.


At 07:40 PM 1/9/2005, you wrote:
A compromise on these two views occurs through my assumption of "Time"
 being a necessary property of observerhood. Sure atemporal worlds
 exist, but there's nobody in them to observe them. Similarly, Hal
 Ruhl's dynamic process is simply the process of observation.


Reply via email to