Dear Hal,
What your defining seems to me to be a NOT map or else it is a mere random map. There is no consistent definition of an "inconsistent" map otherwise, IMHO. Please explain how I am wrong. ;-)
Why not a map that is "a path where the information associated with each step is consistent to some degree /delta with the information available about the prior steps"?
Stephen
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hal Ruhl" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <everything-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, January 29, 2005 3:43 PM
Subject: RE: Belief Statements
I meant to define the symbol "=>>" as:
"=>>" is a path over kernels where each new step is inconsistent with prior steps.
Hal Ruhl
