Dear Bruno,
again a post from you with your wits. I will post my reply (if I get the
relevant points from Russell and - if I can - ) onlist.
However your expression:
>"... I think we can progress
> only by understanding misunderstandings ..."<
(what I assume as 'the list's understanding of 'my' mis...) assumes a
position of judging the content of a proper understanding.
I wonder...

With friendship

John M

PS: with apologies I correct my typo in the post to Russell:
please read "WHOLISTIC" instead of 'wholitic' in my 1st sentence.J.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Marchal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "John M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Russell Standish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<everything-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 27, 2005 2:49 AM
Subject: Re: "Free Will Theorem"


>
> Le 26-avr.-05, à 21:36, John M a écrit :
>
> > Russell wrote:
> > Ah John, if only I could understand what you're saying...
> > *
> > Sorry, Russell, I fell back into my "wholitic" lingo with several
> > items that
> > are not identical to the 'general usage'.
> > I wish you could point out 'some' which I should try to elaborate on.
> > Maybe we could do this in private exchange, to be nice to the list.
>
> That would not be nice to the list, imo. I'm sure people
> on the list can trash by themselves the threads
> in which they are not interested. We have good
> training with the spam. But also, I think we can progress
> only by understanding misunderstandings ...
> In particular I intend to make somme comments
> on a post by John asap, and so I would prefer
> the thread stays online. This is Wei Dai non-moderate
> list, and I know "non-moderation" makes people tending
> to moderate themselves a little bit too much ... :)
> The reason I'm interested in the John/Russell debate is
> that I suspect Russell can swallow my methodology but not
> yet entirely the conclusions; and I suspect John can swallow
> my conclusions, but not really the methodology. So I could
> (selfishly) be helped in communicating my work by finding
> a sort of mean between Russell and John.
> I will elaborate later.
>
> Bruno
>
>
> >
> > John M
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Russell Standish" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "John M" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Cc: "Stathis Papaioannou" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <everything-list@eskimo.com>
> > Sent: Friday, April 22, 2005 10:30 PM
> > Subject: Re: "Free Will Theorem"
> >
> >
> >
> >
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/
>
>


Reply via email to