Le 27-avr.-05, à 16:17, John M a écrit :
again a post from you with your wits. I will post my reply (if I get the
relevant points from Russell and - if I can - ) onlist.
However your expression:"... I think we can progress only by understanding misunderstandings ..."<(what I assume as 'the list's understanding of 'my' mis...) assumes a position of judging the content of a proper understanding. I wonder...
Could you develop a little bit. I'm not sure I figure out what you try to say.