Actually, when I asked the question I was referring to the
interpretation not the immortality. I thought QTI was being used for
that.

Mark

On 5/3/05, aet.radal ssg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> 
> I just realized that "MWI" in the discussion meant "many worlds immortality"
> not the standard "many worlds interpretation". I don't have a lot time to
> sift through the discussions, so I missed that point. I don't buy "MW
> Immortality " in that case, so it hasn't had any effect on my worldview at
> all. 
> 
> "Go 'W'"
> 
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "aet.radal ssg" 
> To: everything-list@eskimo.com
> Subject: Re: Implications of MWI
> Date: Sun, 01 May 2005 18:15:38 -0500
> 
> No. For me, it explained a number things that I had questions about.
> Learning that there seemed to be a scientific reason for what was going on
> changed my worldview. It added order to what was beginning to look rather
> chaotic.
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Mark Fancey" 
> To: everything-list@eskimo.com 
> Subject: Implications of MWI 
> Date: Wed, 27 Apr 2005 10:36:03 -0400 
> 
> > 
> > Did accepting and understanding the MWI drastically alter your 
> > philosophical worldview? If so, how? 
> > 
> > I cannot answer this question myself because I do not truly understand 
> > many parts of it. 
> > 
> > Thanks 
> > 
> > -- 
> > Mark Fancey 
> > Anti-Bushite & Bullshite 
> 
> -- 
> 
>  
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
> http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup
>  -- 
> 
> ___________________________________________________________
> Sign-up for Ads Free at Mail.com
>  http://www.mail.com/?sr=signup 


-- 
Mark Fancey
Philosophical Engineer
"Here you go America, you are free, to do as we tell you, you are
free, to do as we tell you." Bill Hicks

Reply via email to