On Mon, May 23, 2005 at 09:13:49PM +0100, Patrick Leahy wrote:
> 
> For most physicists the Copenhagen interpretation (in some half-understood 
> way) works perfectly well at the lab bench.
> 

Having been such a physicist at some point in my past, I would
disagree that you average physicist even uses the Copenhagen
interpretation. What I used to use in my days as an atomic physics
theoretician was the "shut up and calculate" interpretation. Ie QM is
a mathematical theory - you put your parameters in one end, and crank
out your expected answers at the other end, which you could compare
with experiment.

I remember when being asked to think about it that the notion of wave
function collapse sounded wrong, one couldn't have a physical object
changing at superluminal speeds, which is what this implies. As for
Bohm, his writings were about as meaningful to me as the ravings of a
lunatic (note this is a reflection on me, not a reflection of
Bohm's actual content).

I can say that all experiments I worked on had millions of particles
per second, and we worked with "density matrices", which describe the
behaviour of particle ensembles. Such a description is perfectly
deterministic - no collapses or any other funny business going on. It
was only when I heard about Aspect's experiments that I realised there
was more to it. Ultimately, I realised that the MWI was the only
interpretation that made sense (to me).

Cheers

-- 
*PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which
is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a
virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this
email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you
may safely ignore this attachment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 8308 3119 (mobile)
Mathematics                                    0425 253119 (")
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]             
Australia                                http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
            International prefix  +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpy0LtXJKPOf.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to