Saibal Mitra writes:
> This is actualy another argument against QTI. There are only a finite number
> of different versions of observers. Suppose a 'subjective' time evolution on
> the set of all possible observers exists that is always well defined.
> Suppose we start with observer O1, and under time evolution it evolves to
> O2, which then evolves to O3 etc. Eventually an On will be mapped back to O1
> (if this never happened that would contradict the fact that there are only a
> finite number of O's). But mapping back to the initial state doesn't
> conserve memory. You can thus only subjectively experience yourself evolving
> for a finite amount of time.

Unless... you constantly get bigger!  Then you could escape the
limitations of the Bekenstein bound.

Hal Finney

Reply via email to