rmiller wrote:

At 11:03 AM 6/15/2005, Jesse Mazer wrote:
I wrote:

No, I don't think they don't all have to have the same volume,

Whoops, weird double negative here...that should read "I don't think they all have to have the same volume".


"must have"
"should have"
"are required to have"

Aw, c'mon, now you're just being nitpicky--"have to have" is perfectly good grammar! I googled it and found it used all over the place, including in an example on the BBC "Learning English" page at http://www.bbc.co.uk/worldservice/learningenglish/grammar/learnit/learnitv127.shtml


Reply via email to