Brent Meeker:

>The fact that all these metaphysical problems and bizarre results are predicted
by assuming *everything happens* implies to me that *everything happens* is
likely false. I'm not sure what the best alternative is, but I like Roland
Omnes view point that QM is a probabilistic theory and hence it must predict
probabilities for things that don't happen.
< end quote
Actually, it occurred to me lately that saying "everything happens" may be the same as the paradox of the "set of all sets".
Tom Caylor

Reply via email to