>The fact that all these metaphysical problems and bizarre results are predicted
by assuming *everything happens* implies to me that *everything happens* is
likely false. I'm not sure what the best alternative is, but I like Roland
Omnes view point that QM is a probabilistic theory and hence it must predict
probabilities for things that don't happen.
< end quote
Actually, it occurred to me lately that saying "everything happens" may be the same as the paradox of the "set of all sets".