Dear Bruno,

The duality that I am considering is that proposed by Vaughan Pratt. It is NOT a "substance" dualism. It is more a "process" dualism. Please see the ratmech paper for an explanaition. It is found here:

http://boole.stanford.edu/pub/ratmech.pdf
http://citeseer.ist.psu.edu/pratt95rational.html

Kindest regards,

Stephen

----- Original Message ----- From: "Bruno Marchal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Everything-List List" <everything-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 09, 2005 12:44 PM
Subject: Rép : The Time Deniers


The same can be said with Stephen "dualism". If it is not a "dualism" of substance, then a case in favor of a dualism in comp can be made, and this despite the immaterialist background.

Reply via email to