I suggest you abandon the notion 'bigger'. essentially because it is incompatible with the relation called 'symmetry breaking' - which is a major qualia in modern physics-math.
James Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Does everyone agree with the following proposition: > > For all number x, if x is bigger than 2 then x is bigger than > 1. > > (by "bigger" I mean strictly bigger: 17 is strictly bigger than 16, but > not strictly bigger than 17). > > It would help me to explain some point to non logicians if you tell me > in case you believe the proposition above is false. > > I can put it in another way, like: > > Whatever the number someone can choose, if that number is > bigger than > 2 then it will be bigger than 1. > > Is it obvious? > > Thanks, > > Bruno > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/