I suggest you abandon the notion 'bigger'.

essentially because it is incompatible with
the relation called 'symmetry breaking' - which 
is a major qualia in modern physics-math.

James





Bruno Marchal wrote:
> 
> Does everyone agree with the following proposition:
> 
>          For all number x,  if x is bigger than 2 then x is bigger than
> 1.
> 
> (by "bigger" I mean strictly bigger: 17 is strictly bigger than 16, but
> not strictly bigger than 17).
> 
> It would help me to explain some point to non logicians if you tell me
> in case you believe the proposition above is false.
> 
> I can put it in another way, like:
> 
>           Whatever the number someone can choose, if that number is
> bigger than
>            2 then it will be bigger than 1.
> 
> Is it obvious?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Bruno
> 
> http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/

Reply via email to