Dear Bruno, you (and as I guess: others, too) use the subject phrase. Does it make sense? Reality is supposed to be something independent from our personal manipulations (=1st person interpretation) and so it has got to be objective, untouched by our experience and emotions. Eo ipso it is not subjective. Once we 'subject' it to our personal 'mind' and its own distortions it is "subjective", not objective anymore. So it looks like "subjective reality" is an oxymoron.
I understand if you (all) use the phrase as the 'imagined' and 'acceptable' version of something we CAN handle in our feeble minds. I would not call THAT a 'reality'. It seems to be a 'virtuality' as generated (even if only in modifications if you insist) WITHIN our mind, subject to our personal mental structure and content. I am not ashamed to say: I dunno, but it seems to me... in wich case I separated 'it' from any 'reality'. John M (the bartender, talking into the patrons' discussion)