With regard to YD I have proposed in other posts that our universe consists
of a set of discrete points that are when in their neutral locations
arranged on a face centered cubic grid. Each point is confined to a region
of discrete locations that surround its neutral location in the grid. I
like this grid because its symmetries appear to allow a set of first order
oscillations of the points within their regions in a unit cell consisting
of 12 points around one with all triples being on straight lines that pass
through the central point to represent the basic particles of the Standard
Model. I call such oscillations a [small] dance. A [small] dance can move
through the grid but individual points can not. Larger dances (such as a
SAS) consist of semi "stable" associations of nearby [small] dances.
The entire grid [universe] changes state when a point in a region
asynchronously polls its 12 neighbors and assumes a new location in its
region based on the results. It is a type of Cellular Automaton [CA].
At this level TD seems straight forward since there is no change at all.
The approach is compatible with CT since some CA are capable of universal
computation and the universe it models can contain SAS [the "done
effectively" part] since large dances can be self interactive.
The other things that are in my model which is derived from my "is" "is
not" definitional approach is that the imbedding system:
1) Is one in which all possible states of all universes preexist [multi
world and the model's link to AR],
2) Is randomly dynamic in terms of which states have instantations of
reality [noise in the flow of reality] (a nice explanation of the
accelerating expansion of our universe [additional points as part of the
noise] recently observed),
3) In the dynamic, adjacent states can have instantations of reality that
overlap [the flow of consciousness].
In the end then I must say that it seems my model contains comp.
I indicated to Bruno some time ago that I thought we were to some degree