Hi Godfrey:

`My model starts with what I describe as unavoidable definition - of the All`

`and [simultaneously] the Nothing.`

`Any definition defines a pair of two objects. The target object such as a`

`flower [the "is" part of the pair] and an object that has the remainder of`

`the list of all properties etc. of all possible objects [the "is not" part`

`of the pair]. Generally the "is not" part of the pair is of little`

`use. The All and the Nothing are an interesting "is", "is not"`

`definitional pair. The All is the entire list and the Nothing is the`

`absence of the entire list.`

The Nothing is inherently incomplete and this results in the dynamic.

`This is a brief semi intro and I have posted on this model before as it has`

`developed.`

`Now the All part contains all possible states of all possible`

`universes. This should include the one I believe represents`

`ours. Therefore my All seems to contain universes that support YD and thus`

`comp if Bruno is correct.`

To answer your questions as best I currently can:

`My model appears to contain YD, CT, and AR so if Bruno's follow on`

`reasoning is correct and if in fact my model contains YD, CT, and AR then`

`it contains comp but it is not the same as comp - it would embed comp.`

`Is my model falsifiable? I will have to think about that - after all I`

`just recently got to where it supports a flow of consciousness. Since the`

`model does not say exactly what is on the list that is the All and the`

`'instantation of reality" dynamic is random then what indeed is the scope`

`of "all possible states of all possible universes" and the resulting`

`actually implemented evolving universes?`

`In any event it would be interesting to see if YD can be shown to be`

`false. I think that might start to constrain the All and that would be`

`interesting - [why that constraint and what others are there?].`

Hal At 10:44 AM 8/19/2005, you wrote:

Hi Hal,From what you say below I am not able to determine whether your model isidentical ordistinct from Bruno's in the only point that I am interested in so letme ask you:Is your model falsified if YD is false or can you still "dance" if thatis the case?I am asking because unfalsifiable models turn out to be a lot lessinteresting thanfalsifiable ones as I am sure you understand.... Best regards, Godfrey Kurtz (New Brunswick, NJ)