On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 10:18:22AM -0400, Hal Ruhl wrote:
> 
> I have argued that the Nothing is incomplete [its "mate" - I call it the 
> All - may be inconsistent due to its completeness] and the collection - 
> Nothing + All + the definition - I call the Everything].   If the Nothing 
> is incomplete and the All is not is this a violation of mathematical 
> duality?
> 
> Hal Ruhl
> 

Perhaps "completeness" <-> "consistency" under the duality
operation. So a demonstration of nothing being incomplete is
equivalent to a demonstration that the all is inconsistent.

Cheers

-- 
*PS: A number of people ask me about the attachment to my email, which
is of type "application/pgp-signature". Don't worry, it is not a
virus. It is an electronic signature, that may be used to verify this
email came from me if you have PGP or GPG installed. Otherwise, you
may safely ignore this attachment.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
A/Prof Russell Standish                  Phone 8308 3119 (mobile)
Mathematics                                    0425 253119 (")
UNSW SYDNEY 2052                         [EMAIL PROTECTED]             
Australia                                http://parallel.hpc.unsw.edu.au/rks
            International prefix  +612, Interstate prefix 02
----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Attachment: pgpbo1QGfqlmN.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to