My approach is that there is [exists] a list of possible "features"
of objects and ideas. This list is [at least] countably
infinite. Universes are described by the various one list to two sub
list ways of dividing this list. the number of such divisions is
uncountably infinite [a power set]. Nothing and and my All are one
of these divisions. If any division has a degree of "reality" this
division does. Since the Nothing and the All are a paired sub list
there is no rationale for assigning either Nothing or the All a
higher degree of "reality" than the other. The Nothing suffers
incompleteness and the All suffers inconsistency. The result as
explained in my posts is a fleeting and random assignment of a lower
degree of "reality" to all the other possible divisions.
The only assumption I can see is of the existence of a countably
infinite and divisible list of possibilities.
I do not see how such an assumption can be challenged.
Universes do not arise out of nothing but rather out of the mere
possibility of nothing.
Hal
