At 08:53 AM 11/2/2005, you wrote:
Hal Ruhl wrote:
> So as in the case of my Nothing and my All it seems
> the apex of causation may be neither infinite regression
> "or" termination but rather both [an "and"].
I'm saying that the "All" is on equal ontological footing with the
"Nothing". Pulling something out of Nothing is just as believable
something out of All. I think Quentin touches on the total mystery of both:
As my posts point out re my model it is the simultaneous being
[existence, high degree of "reality"] of the Nothing and my All that
results in the launching of Somethings and all Somethings are
eventually launched over and over.