Dear Bruno,
Are you claiming that the communicable part is to the non-communicable
part as the classical is to the quantum? The Non-cloning aspect of QM and
the copyability of the classical seems to be implied. Is this intentional?
Onward!
Stephen
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruno Marchal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Everything-List List" <everything-list@eskimo.com>
Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 10:03 AM
Subject: Re: Quantum Immortality and Information Flow
snip
Well, actually I hope it will gives the qubits.
I am not contesting the Everett-Hartle-... Deutsch-Zurek explanation of
how bits come from qubits. Just saying comp gives a path from bits to
qubits too. A double path.
It is the incompleteness phenomenon(*) which makes that path double, i.e.
separated into a communicable part and a non communicable part explaining
simultaneously quanta and qualia (I would argue).
