Bruno, John, list,

Bruno wrote:

...I don't exclude at all I could change my mind about that title, either for 
diplomatic reasons and/or for "scientific" reasons (in case Ben succeed for 
example in explaining that G* has nothing to do with theology (even comp 
theologies), which I doubt.

That bar is set too high, I think. I've certainly never claimed that G* has 
nothing to do with theology. Like with any two things, in order to be called 
"theology," G* needs more than a significant relation with theology.

Best, Ben Udell

Reply via email to