Bruno, John, list,
...I don't exclude at all I could change my mind about that title, either for
diplomatic reasons and/or for "scientific" reasons (in case Ben succeed for
example in explaining that G* has nothing to do with theology (even comp
theologies), which I doubt.
That bar is set too high, I think. I've certainly never claimed that G* has
nothing to do with theology. Like with any two things, in order to be called
"theology," G* needs more than a significant relation with theology.
Best, Ben Udell