Hal Ruhl a écrit : > > Hi Georges: > > The key division of my list of possible properties of objects is: > [empty [read the "Nothing"]:all other properties [read my All[perhaps > the Everything]]]. The Nothing is incomplete [there is a meaningful > question it must answer but of course can not] and the All is > complete [the list contains itself] and thus inconsistent. I do not > see a number having either property so a number can not take the > "place" of the Nothing and I do not see any number being able to > describe the Nothing - the empty string is not a number [IMO]. As > for the All - numbers are not internally inconsistent. Finally, if a > number can not describe the Nothing then how can a number describe > the All which is the Nothing's "is not" partner?
I do not understand. You are considering objects that would not have any property at all and objects that would simultaneously have all imaginable properties? Georges. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
