Norman Samish wrote:
> I don't see how a list of numbers could, by itself, contain any meaningful 
> information.  Sure, a list of numbers could be an executable program, but 
> there has to be an executive program to execute the executable program.
> The multiverse has to therefore consist of more than a matrix of numbers 
> which amount to an executable program.

I feel that the computational approach is a wrong direction
for the question of existence. A matrix of numbers is not
the only type of mathematical object the multiverse can be.

> Where could the executive program have come from?   Perhaps one could call 
> it "God."  I can think of no possibility other than  "It was always there," 
> and eternal existence is a concept I can't imagine.  Are there any other 
> possibilities?

I think there is another possibility. I tried to explain it
in my exchanges with John. It relies on several speculations
or conjectures:

- Mathematical objects exist by themeslves ("They were
   (or: are, intemporal) always there"),
- The multiverse is isomorphic to a mathematical object,
- Perception of existence is an internal property of the
   multiverse (mind emerges from matter activity),
- Mathematical existence and physical existence are the
   same ("there is no need that something special be inside
   particles", the contrary is an unnecessary and useless
   dualism, "the fire *is* in the equations").

Some details and some (weak) arguments can be found in my
recent posts to this group. Some papers from Max Tegmark
are also relevant:


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to