Bruno Marchal wrote:
> This means you miss the point. The only assumption is "comp" by which I > mean the "yes doctor" hypothesis together with Church's thesis and a > minimal amount of arithmetical realism (AR: just the idea that > elementary arithmetical truth is independent of me, you ...This is > different from AR+ which says that only numbers exists). > The assumptions you are mentioning are part of the consequences. We can > try later to isolate the precise step where you think I make those > assumptions. I agree the UDA is not so simple: I introduce > supplementary hypotheses to make the argument simple and modular, and > then, later on, I eliminate those supplementary assumptions. I don't agree. I think you slip from "minds can be implemented on more than one kind of hardware" to "minds do not need any kind of hardware". --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
