Brent Meeker wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > Georges Quénot wrote:
> >
> >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >>>Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>What properties of the multiverse would render only one mathematical
> >>>>object
> >>>>real and others abstract...
> >>>
> >>>A non-mathematical property. Hence mathematics alone is not sufficient
> >>>to explain the world. QED.
> >
> >
> > This has to be a non-mathematical property because it is contingent,
> > and all mathematical
> > truth is necessary.
>
> It is necessairly true *given the axioms*. Suppose there is an axiom that
> picks
> out some worlds as real.
>

##
Advertising

An axiom that follows necessarily from other axioms, or a contingent,
optional
axiom ?
Picks out some worlds as real ..from what ?
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---