Brent Meeker wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > Georges Quénot wrote: > > > >>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >>>Quentin Anciaux wrote: > >>> > >>> > >>>>What properties of the multiverse would render only one mathematical > >>>>object > >>>>real and others abstract... > >>> > >>>A non-mathematical property. Hence mathematics alone is not sufficient > >>>to explain the world. QED. > > > > > > This has to be a non-mathematical property because it is contingent, > > and all mathematical > > truth is necessary. > > It is necessairly true *given the axioms*. Suppose there is an axiom that > picks > out some worlds as real. >
An axiom that follows necessarily from other axioms, or a contingent, optional axiom ? Picks out some worlds as real ..from what ? --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
