Bruno Marchal wrote: > > Le 15-mars-06, à 17:51, Georges Quenot a écrit : > >>>> *If* comp is true. I am not sure of that. >>> Me too. But it is the theory I am studying. Also comp provides some >>> neat "etalon philosophy" to compare with other theories. The advantage >>> of comp (which I recall includes Church thesis) is that, at least, >>> many >>> fundamental questions can be addressed. >> Which one for instance (that is not addressed in the view of >> the universe/multiverse as a mathematical object)? > > The relation between first and third person concepts. Comp allows (at > least) and actually necessitates the use of theoretical computer > science(s). It is a mine of interesting results. My work exploits many > of them for the translation of the UD Argument in the language of the > universal machine. Actually it is one of them, Godel's theorem, which > convinces me of the possibility of the enterprise.
I am sorry. I don't see. What Comp can say about the relation between first and third person concepts that could not be said in a "simple" "mathematical-monism" context? Georges. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
