[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Georges Quénot wrote: > >> My 2. and 3. remain anyway. >> >> Georges. > > "2. There may well exist a "Harry Potter universe" that > includes a counterpart of you but it is not causaly > related to our universe (too far for instance) and > this is why we cannot observe it. " > > The idea that some universes causally relate and others > do not is a kind of physical law. But if every mathematical > object is instantiated, evey mathematically describable physical law > must be as well. So there must be universes, or rather sets of > universes, in which the law about non interacting is false or > works differently.
There might be universes interacting one with each other (though from my viewpoint I would tend to consider a set of interactive universes as a single universe) but it might also be that the one in which we live is among the ones that are not causally connected to any other. And what about 3. ? Georges. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
