John M wrote: > > --- Georges Quénot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> John M wrote: >>> [...] >>> Don't be a sourpus, I was not attacking YOU. >> Well. I do not know exactly why I felt concerned. >> I probably missed your point. >> >>> [...] >>> By George! (not Georges) don't you imply such things >>> into my mind after my decade under nazis and two under >>> commis, now 3+ in the (hypocritical) US 'free' speach! >> >> Well. OK Again. But what was your point then? >> > Georges, > I am not sure whether I wrote this to you in personal > or list-mail, you did not quote my text.
I think it was on the list (I just hit "reply"). > After going through a thousand posts of the same > subject and none is relevant to my thinking, forgive > me if I get edgy. I do not repeat the exercise to find > where and upon what did I write what. > > Could you leave it this way? > I did not want to offend you. That's OK. I must be too sensitive on these subjects. I do not want the debate to turn passionate either. I was just asking what you intended to mean by: ] 2. Is reasonable or rational thinking exclusive for ] ONLY those, who live in a 'numbers' obsession? ] or is it an elitist heaughtiness to look down to all, ] who do not share such obsession? How about vice versa? ] 3. Suppose the 'numbers based' worldview gains ] universal approval (by ~3006?) - what will that help ] in the betterment of the world? or even in the ] betterment of human thinking? Or even of more civil ] general life- conditions? What you said just above is a sufficient answer for me. Georges. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
