Georges Quenot a écrit : SKIP
> I consider the possibility that mind emerges from matter > activity. I think that modern physics and the synthetic > theory of evolution provide a resonable (though partial) > account for the "technical" capabilities of the human > mind. What remains unclear to me is "consciousness". > The simplest explanation is that this is just the way > things appear to human organisms but I still find that > a bit short. Does Comp have more to say on this issue? > > Georges. [I repost the following message for John as he asked me do so because he experienced some problem for posting to the group after he changed his mail address.] [JM[: So you consider matter as primary and mind as some consequence of it? In another "Mindset" (pardon me the pun) the reverse holds, I could formulate it as: matter is the figment of ideation (mind?) as "mind-interpreted" impacts from 'reality-percept' do seem as (physical???) effects. This position comes from the (Q?)atomic physics based observation that ultimately the fundamental base of 'matter' does not contain matter-like ingredients. (I just asked Bruno about HIS position of consciousnes) John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
