Quentin Anciaux wrote: > Le Vendredi 24 Mars 2006 20:38, 1Z a écrit : > > Quentin Anciaux wrote: > > > A quick point still : > > > You seem to have a problem with mathematical monism and reject it due to > > > HP world... but HP world is not a consequence of mathematical monism, but > > > a consequence of many world theories which can themself presuppose > > > mathematical monism or not. Everett many world theory is not mathematical > > > monism, still it support HP world. > > > > Physically MW theories are inherently more constrained than > > mathematical > > MW theories. You are not going to get water flowing uphill in a > > physical MW > > theory, because it contradicts the consevation of energy. > > Quantum theory predict that there is a very tiny chance that a broken cup of > coffee restructured itself... yet in everett mw theory as all choices are > made, there exists branches where this happen all the time. Yet as I'll quote > you "it is not observed"... but that does not mean anything against everett > mw.
The fact that a theory is makes predictions that are not observed is always against it. > > Plus physical > > theories > > have more resources available to explain why wrlds are separate and > > non-interacting. > > What resources ? space, time, causality. > > Finally, there is no particular reason why I have to support physical > > MW theories either! > > That's the whole point where you wanted to get till the beginning, you simply > refuse any many world theories. I don't refuse them on the basis of prejudice, I refuse them on the basis of not matching my experience. > Quentin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
