Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> Le Vendredi 24 Mars 2006 20:38, 1Z a écrit :
>>Quentin Anciaux wrote:
>>>A quick point still :
>>>You seem to have a problem with mathematical monism and reject it due to
>>>HP world... but HP world is not a consequence of mathematical monism, but
>>>a consequence of many world theories which can themself presuppose
>>>mathematical monism or not. Everett many world theory is not mathematical
>>>monism, still it support HP world.
>>Physically MW theories are inherently more constrained than
>>MW theories. You are not going to get water flowing uphill in a
>>physical MW
>>theory, because it contradicts the consevation of energy. 
> Quantum theory predict that there is a very tiny chance that a broken cup of 
> coffee restructured itself... yet in everett mw theory as all choices are 
> made, there exists branches where this happen all the time. Yet as I'll quote 
> you "it is not observed"... but that does not mean anything against everett 
> mw.

It doesn't mean much against Everett because Everett predicts extremely small 
probabilities for such events and so effectively predicts they will not be 
  Whether is counts against everything-exists theories depends on the 
probability measure over such theories - a frequent topic of discussion on this 

Brent Meeker

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to