Le 24-mars-06, à 19:36, 1Z a écrit :

> Quentin Anciaux wrote: >> Le Vendredi 24 Mars 2006 16:40, 1Z a écrit : >>> No, I am not *spatially** inside a universe, becaue space is >>> physics,. >>> not maths ! The number 2 that features in the set {1,2,3} is exactly >>> the same as the number 2 in the set {2,3,4}. It has no way of knowing >>> which >>> set it is in! Mathematical sets are **not** spatial regions! You are >>> thinking >>> about maths in a physical way, not in a mathematical way! >>> >> >> You're playing with the language... I'll try to make another mail >> longer to >> explain what I mean. Please just recall that I said that "You (at >> time t) is >> part of the *infinite* set of computations which goes throught your >> state at >> that time". That means Yes *2* cannot distinguish in which set... So >> for two >> times now you try to put word in my mouth which aren't. > > That only makes the issue of my not experiencing HP universes worse... Sure. It is because you are lead to the whiote rabbit problem. But it is not because a problem appears to be "worse" that the problem does not admit a solution, and you are free to study the one I derived from few assumptions (comp, which is just "yes doctor" + church thesis + arithmetical realism. The "yes doctor" can then be eliminated through the listening of the discourse made by self-referentially correct universal machine. Bruno http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---