Brent Meeker wrote:
> You would like this book by Vic Stenger: > > http://www.colorado.edu/philosophy/vstenger/nothing.html Yes, I am aaware of his work. > Vic defends the view that physical laws are based on point-of-view-invariance; > that is a constraint we place on what we call a law. As such, they are not > really laws constraining nature, they are symmetries that are an absence of > 'law' (i.e. structure). Laws ultimately can only be a statement about how the world is (as opposed to how it is not). If they are statements about to the effect that the world is symmetrical, then the world is symmeerical not asymmetrical. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
