Bruno Marchal wrote: > Le 30-mars-06, à 20:22, 1Z a écrit : > > > I think > > that having a richer ontology automatically makes it easier > > to solve metaphysical problems, since you can say that X , Y or Z > > is intrinsic to the universe and therefore not to be "explained away" > > as something else
> This is so true that with such ontological sort of explanation, you can > explain everything: just say "because of the will of God". Saying > "intrinsic to the universe" is just as easy explanation. It is bad > theology. Such a theory at least does not predict what is not observed. MM over-predicts (white rabbits, Harry Potter) and under-explains (time, consciousness). --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
