--- Bruno Marchal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi John, > > > So: WHAT can be conscious? > > > A person. Or a soul. Or someone ... > ... *relatively* incarnated in a body or in numbers > or machines if we > accept the comp hyp. > > I would say, > > Best > > Bruno > > http://iridia.ulb.ac.be/~marchal/ > Does this mean a dualistic restriction in the topic? BTW a soul is not incarnated, (whatever it is), it is a companion of carne. I like the 'relatively incarnated': having SOME relation with incarnation (maybe machine). That may be your opinion and you are just as free to use it as I am to my different connotation. Thanks John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
