a simple question ... (which, if it cannot be satisfactorally answered/rationalized/justified, its unanswereability will indicate why any creationist models versus 'science' models of cosmology, are not reconcilable).

## Advertising

Q: What conditions-of-state of the existing functioning universe act as the boundary condition which -prevents- the ZPE quantum foam from initiating at anytime/anyplce in the cosmos - a new 'ultimate singularity' from instigating (again and randomly and unrestrictedly)? ============================================== Collateral situational notion on whether G-contant is +, 0, or -. ... in frame of reference of standard thermodynamic concept of entropy. One model for the 'final (mathematical) solution' to the universe posits that all matter will uniformly distribute into all possible 'space' uniformly, leaving no dis-equilibrium and therefore - ultimately - no differential, such as is required for any activity through which 'work' can be accomplished. The 'final' thermodynamic picture is of a universe maximally depleted in actionability -- at all possible levels of 'energy'. ... the problem with that model however is that the current limiting definitional assignment of 'energy' with qualia of -motion- and transference or redistribution of motionenergy alone are patently limiting, and contain a significant but fundamental assignment error. Consider a gedankenuniverse in which only two motionless masses exist - no initial relative motion between them and no other masses present. Under conventional 'definition' they are thermodynamically depleted. Yet, their mutual spacetime is -not- 'uniform everywhere'. And it is the unbalanced, non-uniform -spacetime- which provides the source function for additional actionable activities. There is a character of spacetime which is not 'thermodynamic' but which is a gradient source, significant enough to instigate anti-(thermodynamic)entropy motion. (!) In the end-analysis of a UFT, it is gravity which trumps all other action impelling gradients. AND it is obligatory that gravity be re-defined because of this reasoning, to coordinate the qualia -of- energy thermodynamics with the non-energy definitions and qualia -of- gravity. The question of erasability or not of information involves absolute accessibility of all qualia with all other qualia. Transducableness of any information (form) into any other .. at least in essential conversion. Without such inter-translation capacity, (some) information is effectively PRE-erased. Non-accesibility isn't limited to erasure (now you see it now you don't), but includes 'preclusion' (exists but: never see it never will). Bringing this inclusive logic to bear on "gradients" means that trope-ic qualities must reside as concurrent with -gradients- per se _irrespective_ of the format of system -- be it inertial, electromagnetic, -or- gravitational. That is the unifying "informational" linking qualia-primitive of -all- these formats ... what the UFT wellsprings from and in-which it is discoverable again. "Entropy" and "negentropy" are characteristics of all gradients and are informational parameters of all gradients .. NOT of thermodynamic gradients alone. The exclusive linking of entropy with thermodynamics and thermodynamics alone is patently hampering and incorrect and limiting. The association of information with negentropy is already indicative of this. Whats required is the association of information with differential field structure and not just with snap-shot 'content quantification' state-comparisons, a with b and none else. Jamie Rose --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---