Le 01-juil.-06, à 19:35, Brent Meeker a écrit :

> That's not contrary to my conception at all.  I certainly do "bet" on 
> the existence of others, and
> of chairs and tables and stars and electrons and myself, and all for 
> the essentially the same reasons.


> I don't understand the conjunction of "necessarily" and 
> "serendipitous".

It can be proved that if I am a self-referentially correct machine then 
I cannot know which machine I am.
So if the doctor *guaranties* that I will survive the digital graft at 
the substitution level he has chosen, then I'l better run ... (if I 


You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 

Reply via email to