You seem to think that evolution (or matter, or the multiverse) must adapt to a preordained logic. Adjusting, approximately, to a fixed metaphysical truth.
-----Ursprungligt meddelande----- Från: email@example.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För 1Z Skickat: den 10 juli 2006 15:58 Till: Everything List Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Only logic is necessary? Lennart Nilsson wrote: > Cooper says that a formalist, with only formal constraints on his logic > (such as consistensy) is at the mercy of the formalism itself. Meaning what ? That the formalism might not be giving answers that are "really" right ? How would we tell ? using some other logic ? Or empricial disproof ? But empirical disproof itself rests on the logical principle of non-contradiction. The only kind of logic that can be shown to be wrong is informal logic (e.g. the Wasson Test), which can be shown to be wrong using formal logic. > He calls for a relativistic > evolutionary logic where classical logic only would be justified for certain > special classes of problems. An evolutionary metatheory of logic would > recognize which those problems are. And would itself be ineveitably based on some kind of logic. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Everything List" group. To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---