You seem to think that evolution (or matter, or the multiverse) must adapt
to a preordained logic. Adjusting, approximately, to a fixed metaphysical
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] För 1Z
Skickat: den 10 juli 2006 15:58
Till: Everything List
Ämne: Re: SV: SV: Only logic is necessary?
Lennart Nilsson wrote:
> Cooper says that a formalist, with only formal constraints on his logic
> (such as consistensy) is at the mercy of the formalism itself.
Meaning what ? That the formalism might not be giving answers
that are "really" right ? How would we tell ? using some
other logic ? Or empricial disproof ? But empirical disproof
itself rests on the logical principle of non-contradiction.
The only kind of logic that can be shown to be wrong
is informal logic (e.g. the Wasson Test), which can be shown
to be wrong using formal logic.
> He calls for a relativistic
> evolutionary logic where classical logic only would be justified for
> special classes of problems. An evolutionary metatheory of logic would
> recognize which those problems are.
And would itself be ineveitably based on some kind of logic.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to email@example.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at