John Mikes writes:

> "My" mutation story is based on interactive responses to the ceaseless 
> changes of  "the rest of the world" producing variations in offsprings. Some 
> more compatible than others.
> The variations with more 'fitness'(?) will proliferate more abundantly so 
> they are the "successful" ones. Scientists consider most variations still as 
> "the same" species and in their intermittent snapshots realize "changes" as 
> mutation - towards a better adapted fitness for survival. The reverse way to 
> how it happened. But it looks like that. No creature realizes a 'better way 
> to survive' and has a wing or fin let grow out for that purpose.
> The variants of the species "select" themselves for a better proliferation in 
> the ever changing circumstances of the environment. The '[unsuccessful do not 
> even show up (e.g. the calf with 5 feet: it was eaten by the wolf before 
> copulating age).

That's the theory of evolution. Are you agreeing or disagreeing?

Stathis Papaioannou
Be one of the first to try Windows Live Mail.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to