Le Vendredi 21 Juillet 2006 22:40, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> Quentin Anciaux wrote:
> > Le Vendredi 21 Juillet 2006 22:08, Brent Meeker a écrit :
> >>No, the hypothetical was stronger than that: it was that I knew exactly
> >> how your brain worked to the degree that I could make one.
> > You could know everything on how my brain works without being ever able
> > feeling being me... And I repeat if you could then you would be me by
> > definition. Me is the only one able to feel being me... It is non-sense
> > to claim otherwise, what ever you could know on the external working and
> > behavior of myself.
> As I understood the question was whether we could ever know how another
> person/brain/alien felt - not whether we could experience their feeling.
But in this case what is the difference between knowing how and having the
experience ? If you could know how then you should be able to recreate the
experience for yourself and feel the feeling of being me ;) Then it means you
are me so it means you couldn't know how I feel (because you won't be you at
that time)... This is exactly what is uncommunicable about 1st person... And
as I understood the question, it is about this, some parts of 1st person
experiences are not communicable (in a 3rd sharable way) and not knowable
apart from the person who experiences it.
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to firstname.lastname@example.org
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at