Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
> Brent Meeker writes:
> 
> 
>>Stathis Papaioannou wrote:
>>
>>>Peter Jones writes (quoting SP):
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>>The constraints (a) and (b) you mention are ad hoc and an
>>>>>unnecessary complication. Suppose Klingon computers change their
>>>>>internal code every clock cycle according to the well-documented
>>>>>radioactive decay pattern of a sacred stone 2000 years ago. If we
>>>>>got our hands on one of these computers and monitored its
>>>>>internal states it would seem completely random; but if we had
>>>>>the Klingon manual, we would see that the computer was actually
>>>>>multiplying two numbers, or implementing a Klingon AI, or 
>>>>>whatever. Would you say that these computations were not valid
>>>>>because it's a dumb way to design a computer?
>>>>
>>>>I'd say that a defintion of "computer" that applies to everything
>>>>is useless.
>>>
>>>
>>>I agree, it's completely useless to *us* because we couldn't interact
>>>with it. That would be the end of the matter unless we say that
>>>computation can lead to consciousness, creating as it were its own
>>>observer. Are you prepared to argue that the aforementioned Klingon
>>>AI suddenly stops being conscious when the last copy of the manual
>>>which would allow us to interact with it is destroyed?
>>
>>If it's intelligent we should be able to interact with it without a manual.
> 
> 
> I should have specified, there is no input or output device connected. With 
> a "normal" computer we might look for patterns in its internal states and 
> design drivers for a keyboard and monitor, but with this computer its 
> internal states are apparently completely random unless you have the 
> original design specifications. 
> 
> Stathis Papaioannou

I don't think "intelligence" is meaningful without an environment with 
which it can interact.  The same for computation: what distinguishes 
computation and noise is a context in which it interacts with its 
environment.

Brent Meeker

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To post to this group, send email to everything-list@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/everything-list
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to