On Sunday, February 2, 2025 at 3:24:53 PM UTC-7 Brent Meeker wrote:

On 2/2/2025 12:42 AM, Alan Grayson wrote:

Einstein claimed that when his GR field equations predicted an explanding 
universe when he believed in the Steady State theory, he added the CC to GR 
to make it consistent with his belief. 

That's not quite accurate.  He saw that solutions to the GR equations for a 
universe contained an undetermined constant, the Cosmological Constant.  So 
he sought to determine it from the observed data.  He consulted the best 
astronomers of his time and they assured him that the universe consisted of 
Milky Way and a some scattered nebula and it was unchanging.  So he set the 
CC value to make the universe in equilibrium. 


Google says the following: The cosmological constant, often associated with 
dark energy, represents a positive force that drives the accelerated 
expansion of the universe, acting as a repulsive force against gravity. 

If the GR field equations imply an expanding universe without a CC, how can 
an accelerated
expansion using the CC result in a steady state universe, the one E 
believed to be the case?
Wasn't the insertion of the CC supposed to force the field equations to 
imply a steady state
universe? How can it do that if the expansion rate is accelerated? AG
 

As soon as he published this, it was pointed out to him that this would be 
an unstable equilibrium and was not consistent with the observed existence 
of the universe. About the same time Hubble published his discovery that 
the universe was expanding and Einstein called the CC, "My greatest 
blunder."  If not for the astronomers he might have predicted the expansion 
of the universe before Hubble observed it.  What a coup that would have 
been.

But I recall a remark by Vic Stenger that the constant could have arisen 
naturally as the constant in an indefinite integral. Is there any substance 
to Stenger's claim? 

Sure.  But the value of the constant can't be derived from the equation.  
Like any constant of integration it has to be determined by something else, 
usually boundary conditions.

Brent

That is, in the opaque process of creating the GR field equations, do 
INDEFINITE integrals play a role? AG. --

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/193b48d6-976a-4089-83ea-a1a904b19105n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to