Give him a break. He advocates consciousness in woke academic settings, in 
the hope of one day securing a woke academic job and salary. Every vulgar 
post here sabotages his own effort to be taken seriously. Even to future 
employers. His country's transition from dictatorship was enabled by years 
of woke efforts by his countrymen, woke EU diplomacy, and access to EU 
structural funds, that woke Europeans pay taxes for, enabled by woke US 
soft power since WW2.

His very freedom to insult and undermine his name's credibility, his goals, 
his project, his acquired standard of living, his education, is all the 
result of the very woke efforts he wants to save the world from with 
revolutionary ideas that are as common as everybody's personal beliefs. And 
if they worked on all the women he claims as conquests, he wouldn't have 
time to post nor project his frustration towards every post he replies to 
each and every day.

His drive towards hypermasculine, strong man aesthetics is something he 
doesn't have the genetics for. He is "only consciousness exists" but 
unhappy with his physical beta appearance. And all the hate and hysteria 
just mirrors lack of self-esteem. List members who understand this, can 
remind him that voluntary commitment is not something to be ashamed of, and 
that the self-hate he sees as necessary is, in fact, not necessary. Or they 
can let him post and continue to let him believe that it makes some 
positive difference, which he is utterly convinced of. As if anybody's 
judgement here on anybody else mattered. 

On Tuesday, April 29, 2025 at 4:08:06 PM UTC+2 Alan Grayson wrote:

> On Tuesday, April 29, 2025 at 12:30:43 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
>
> Only because you put 2 bricks on top of each other in different positions 
> until you find a position in which they dont fall that is not science. Is 
> just rqndom guessing until something works. But you have no idea why it 
> works. Sure, you can invent theories: it works because that position is 
> blessed by Gods. But that is not science. Science is only when you know the 
> true reason.
>
>
> You don't know shit. What you offer is the pretention of knowledge. The 
> "true reason" of anything is unknown, even in mathematics, and having a 
> placeholder for what can be known, in your case "consciousness",  is 
> worthless. Science is a progression of approximations to truth, a work in 
> progress. AG
>
> On Tuesday, 29 April 2025 at 04:26:15 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> On Monday, April 28, 2025 at 8:40:59 AM UTC-6 Cosmin Visan wrote:
>
> @Alan. You make the classical confusion between science and technology. It 
> has the deeper roots of you not understanding the meaning of the word 
> "useful". Only because something is useful, it doesn't mean it is true. 
> Root canal is useful, but is not science, is just technology.
>
>
> Technology depends on science, crucially in fact. You're the one who has 
> no understanding of what you write. Why don't you just STFU? AG
>
>
> On Monday, 28 April 2025 at 17:06:04 UTC+3 Alan Grayson wrote:
>
> On Sunday, April 27, 2025 at 2:14:30 PM UTC-6 John Clark wrote:
>
> *I don't understand how those who called themselves futurists can still 
> support this man. *
>
> *Trump is gutting what made American science great* 
> <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Qk4FBS73Ts&t=20s>
>
> *John K Clark*
>
>
> Johnny one-note continues to waste bandwidth here. Please, let's get rid 
> of him and his dumb posts. He thinks science is a religion, but surely uses 
> anesthetics for surgery and root canal work. So hypocritical and just plain 
> dumb. AG 
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Everything List" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to everything-list+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/everything-list/87041ae6-9d32-4470-b9ee-c3ab5d2e75a9n%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to